| 149 | 0 | 13 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为探究知识域耦合对团队创新绩效的作用机制,选取团队心理资本与知识场活性作为中介,冗余资源作为调节,基于411位高新技术行业的员工样本,运用结构方程模型和模糊集定性比较分析两种方法检验理论模型。研究结果发现:(1)知识域耦合及其分解变量(互补性知识耦合和迭代性知识耦合)对团队创新绩效有显著的正向影响;(2)团队心理资本和知识场活性在其中发挥了链式中介作用;(3)冗余资源在影响路径中存在正向调节作用。采用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA)对团队创新绩效的构型分析,得出提高团队创新绩效的5条路径,并总结为三种前因组态模式,即“外部主体互动模式”“团队成员互动模式”和“资源禀赋提升模式”。
Abstract：To explore the mechanism of knowledge domain coupling on team innovation performance,Selecting team psychological capital and knowledge field activity as intermediary and redundant resources as moderators,based on a sample of 411 employees in the high-tech industry,the theoretical model was tested by using two methods:structural equation model and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. The research results showed that:(1) The coupling of knowledge domains and their decomposed variables(complementary knowledge coupling and iterative knowledge coupling) had a significant positive impact on the team's innovation performance;(2) Team psychological capital and knowledge field activity played a chain-like mediating role in this process;(3) Redundant resources had a positive moderating effect in influencing the path. The fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method(fsQCA) was used to analyze the configuration of team innovation performance,and five paths to improve team innovation performance were obtained,which were summarized as three antecedent configuration modes,namely " external subject interaction mode", " team member interaction mode" and " resource endowment enhancement mode".
[1]Laursen K,Masciarelli F,Prencipe A. Regions Matter:How Localized Social Capital Affects Innovation and External Knowledge Acquisition[J]. Organization Science,2012,23(1):177-193.
[2]Grant R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic management journal,1996,17(S2):109-122.
[3]Minling C,Ziye T,Jing X. Knowledge domain coupling,digital transformation and R&D team innovation performance[J]. Management Decision, 2025, 63(7):2153-2176.
[4]宋欣,周玉玺,杨阳.多层次导向的心理资本与知识员工创新绩效:基于团队社会资本的调节中介模型[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2014,34(9):89-102+113.
[5]王萧萧,朱桂龙,王中和.筑好巢搭好桥:产学研合作知识耦合、信任与组织双元学习关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(16):58-66.
[6]于飞,刘明霞,王凌峰,等.知识耦合对制造企业绿色创新的影响机理:冗余资源的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2019,22(3):54-65+76.
[7]Salancik G R,Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1978,23(2):224-253.
[8]Huanhuan C,Yanhong Y,Huiping Z. How does knowledge coupling affect exploratory and exploitative innovation? The chained mediation role of organizational memory and knowledge creation[J]. Technology Analysis&Strategic Management,2021,33(6):713-727.
[9]Yayavaram S,Chen W R. Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance:The moderating role of technological complexity[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(3):377-396.
[10]Dibiaggio L,Nasiriyar M,Nesta L. Substitutability and complementarity of technological knowledge and the inventive performance of semiconductor companies[J].Research Policy,2014,43(9):1582-1593.
[11]李永周,贺海涛,刘旸.基于知识势差与耦合的产学研协同创新模型构建研究[J].工业技术经济,2014,33(1):88-94.
[12]Ardito L,Natalicchio A,Appio F P,et al. The role of scientific knowledge within inventing teams and the moderating effects of team internationalization and team experience:Empirical tests into the aerospace sector[J]. Journal of Business Research,2021,128:701-710.
[13]Migdadi M M. Knowledge management,customer relationship management and innovation capabilities[J].Journal of Business&Industrial Marketing,2021,36(1):111-124.
[14]Jin N,Yang N,Fawad Sharif S M,et al. Changes in knowledge coupling and innovation performance:the moderation effect of network cohesion[J]. Journal of Business&Industrial Marketing,2022,37(11):2380-2395.
[15]Del Giudice M,Maggioni V. Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks:a global view[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2014,18(5):841-846.
[16]Bekar C,Carlaw K,Lipsey R. General purpose technologies in theory, application and controversy:a review[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2018,28(5):1005-1033.
[17]Appio F P,Frattini F,Petruzzelli A M,et al. Digital transformation and innovation management:A synthesis of existing research and an agenda for future studies[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2021,38(1):4-20.
[18]姚艳虹,葛哲宇,周惠平.创新网络中知识耦合、组织记忆与企业创新绩效[J].软科学,2018,32(8):38-42.
[19]Jayaram J,Pathak S. A holistic view of knowledge integration in collaborative supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2013,51(7):1958-1972.
[20]Caner T,Tyler B B. The effects of knowledge depth and scope on the relationship between R&D alliances and new product development[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2015,32(5):808-824.
[21]谢倩芸,钱晓烨,李倩.团队心理资本对团队与个体任务绩效的影响[J].中国软科学,2022(6):124-132.
[22]Chen M,Mi X M,Xue J,et al. The impact of entrepreneurial team psychological capital on innovation performance:The mediating role of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding[J]. Frontiers in Psychology,2023,14:1133270.
[23]Luthans F,Avolio B J,Avey J B,et al. Positive psychological capital:Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction[J]. Personnel psychology,2007,60(3):541-572.
[24]Jiao Y,Zhang X,Lu S,et al. Research on the influence of team psychological capital on team members’ work performance[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2022, 13:1072158.
[25]顾建平,崔雨欣.高管团队社会资本与企业发展韧性:团队心理资本与风险承担能力的链式中介作用[J].技术经济,2023,42(4):172-184.
[26]朱云鹃,陈金标.跨界搜寻联合与匹配平衡对企业技术创新绩效的影响:知识耦合的中介作用与柔性惯例的调节作用[J].软科学,2024,38(2):95-102+144.
[27]杨皖苏,杨善林.联盟网络知识嵌入性、知识耦合与企业绩效:基于知识距离的视角[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,55(1):44-50+126-127.
[28]Luthans F,Youssef C M,Rawski S L. A tale of two paradigms:The impact of psychological capital and reinforcing feedback on problem solving and innovation[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior Management,2011,31(4):333-350.
[29]Zinger A,Wolff S,Ruf P,et al. The power of shared positivity:organizational psychological capital and firm performance during exogenous crises[J]. Small Business Economics,2022,58(2):689-716.
[30]魏国宏,闫强.知识场活性对企业开放式创新绩效影响研究[J].经济问题,2019(10):64-70.
[31]李敏,周颖霞,杜鹏程.平台型领导如何提升团队创新绩效:基于SEM与fs QCA的链式中介分析[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(5):129-139.
[32]曹勇,谷佳,王子欣,等.技术多元化、知识场活性与新产品开发绩效:高管团队异质性的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44(5):115-129.
[33]王松,徐雅静,刘新民.知识共创视角下协同要素异质性、知识场活性对社区创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(14):102-110.
[34]杨倩,焦特,雷亚萍.团队心理资本对个体双元创新行为的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(15):139-147.
[35]Nonaka I. and Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation[J]. Long Range Planning,1996,29(4):196-201.
[36]Ritala P, Olander H, Michailova S, et al. Knowledge sharing,knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance:An empirical study[J]. Technovation,2015,35:22-31.
[37]Sharfman MP,Wolf G,Chase R B,et al. Antecedents of organizational slack[J]. Academy of Management Review,1988,13(4):601-614.
[38]方润生,陆振华,王长林,等.不同类型冗余资源的来源及其特征:基于决策方式视角的实证分析[J].预测,2009,28(5):59-64.
[39]Sirmon D G,Hitt M A,Arregle J L,et al. Capability strengths and weaknesses in dynamic markets:investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(13):1386-1409.
[40]陈会英,刘彤辉,周衍平.技术多元化对高新技术企业双元创新绩效的影响研究:冗余资源的调节效应[J].现代商业,2024(21):97-100.
[41]Kim K K,Umanath N S,Kim J Y,et al. Knowledge complementarity and knowledge exchange in supply channel relationships[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2012,32(1):35-49.
[42]Jiang H,Yang J,Liu W. Innovation ecosystem stability and enterprise innovation performance:the mediating effect of knowledge acquisition[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2022,26(11):378-400.
[43]汤丹丹,温忠麟.共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J].心理科学,2020,43(1):215-223.
[44]Ragin C C. Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. University of Chicago press,2009.
基本信息:
中图分类号:F272.92;F273.1
引用信息:
[1]陈敏灵,乔进国,薛静,等.知识域耦合如何影响团队创新绩效？——基于SEM与fsQCA的双重分析[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)().
基金信息:
国家社科基金项目（24BGL304）; 陕西省科技厅创新能力支撑计划软科学项目（2025KG-YBXM-133）; 陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目（20JZ078）
2026-05-11
2026-05-11
2026-05-11