| 4,453 | 4 | 15 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
不论在十八世纪还是当今时代,卢梭的思想都饱受争议,尤其是他在试图调和个体自由与秩序的过程中发生的矛盾,也是其思想局限性所在。尽管如此,卢梭仍然批判吸收了近代思想家霍布斯和洛克的自由思想,并认为通过订立契约而找到某种形式的政府和立法者便能够指引人民获得社会自由(政治自由),最终实现道德自由。卢梭的思想被马克思主义者所借鉴,并为当代中国民主政治建设提供了重要的理论支持。
Abstract：Whether in the eighteenth century or in the present era,Rousseau's thought was full of contradictions,which were caused in his attempt to reconcile individual freedom and order,and also became the limitation of his ideology. However,Rousseau still criticized and absorbed the freedom thought of modern thinkers Hobbes and Locke. He believed that finding a certain form of government and legislator by contracting could guide the people to obtain social freedom( political freedom) and ultimately realize moral freedom. Rousseau's ideas are borrowed by Marxists and provide important theoretical support for the construction of contemporary China's democratic politics
[1]卢梭.社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
[2]霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复,黎廷弼,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.
[3]洛克.政府论(下篇)[M].丰俊功,张玉梅,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[4]中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集:第七卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[5]卢梭.论人类不平等的起源[M].高修娟,译.上海:上海三联书店,2009.
[6]卢梭.孤独漫步者的遐想[M].钱培鑫,译.北京:译林出版社,2006.
[7]孙晓春.卢梭的人民主权论与中国近代的民主进程[J].贵州社会科学.2009(5).
[8]傅达林,岳智慧.坚持党的领导人民当家作主依法治国有机统一[N].解放军报,2018-01-22.
基本信息:
DOI：
中图分类号:D091
引用信息:
[1]王云,刘亚平.卢梭《社会契约论》中的自由观及其启示[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2018,27(03):57-62.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目(13XKS014)