nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 04, v.35 93-99
无思无为:二程“无为”观探析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金项目“‘道法自然’观念发展史及价值研究”(23BZX020); 西北大学研究生科研创新项目“基于‘寂’‘化’范畴的二程理学本体论体系探析”(CX2026048)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-08-06
出版时间: 2026-08-06
移动端阅读
摘要:

二程的“无为”观是其思想体系中无法绕过的重要一环,但一直没有引起学界的足够重视。二程“无为”观源自《易传》“寂然不动”的本体论思想,与老子“无为无不为”的“无为”观相区别,并且二程在“无为”观的构建过程中吸收了华严宗“理事无碍”的思想。二程的“无为”观在其工夫论、政治论、心性论等思想领域均有涉及,以无为、无欲、无私等为具体表现,说明“无为”是二程思想体系中不可回避的关键环节。与二程同时代的周敦颐、邵雍、张载等人也频繁地在他们的著作学说中阐述“无为”观念,可见“无为”对于北宋五子来说是一种共识。二程的“无为”观伴随其“寂感”天理本体的建构而生,且彻上彻下、一以贯之,因此,探析二程的“无为”观,有助于准确把握其在二程整体思想体系中的理论内涵。

Abstract:

The " non-action" view of the two Cheng scholars is an important part of their ideological system that cannot be bypassed,but it has never received sufficient attention from the academic circle. The " nonaction" view of the two Chengs originated from the ontological thought of " still and motionless" in the " Yi Zhuan",which is distinct from Laozi's concept of " non-action"( wu wei),which implies both non-intervention and the ability to achieve everything. Moreover,in the process of constructing the " non-action" view,the two Chengs absorbed the thought of " governing things without hindrance" of the Huayan School. The " non-action" concept of the two Chengs was touched upon in their ideological fields such as the theory of practice,the theory of politics,and the theory of mind and nature. With non-action,non-desire,and non-selflessness as specific manifestations,it was indicated that " non-action" is an unavoidable key link in the ideological system of the two Chengs. Zhou Dunyi,Shao Yong,Zhang Zai and others who were contemporary with the two Chengs also frequently expounded the concept of " non-action" in their works and doctrines. It can be seen that " non-action" was a consensus among the Five Scholars of the Northern Song Dynasty. The " non-action" view of the two Chengs emerged along with the construction of their " sense of stillness" natural principle essence,and it is consistent from top to bottom. Therefore,exploring the " non-action" view of two Chengs is helpful for accurately grasping its theoretical connotation in the overall ideological system of the two Chengs.

参考文献

[1]葛荣晋.中国哲学范畴通论[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,2001:795.

[2]程颢,程颐.二程集[M].王孝鱼,点校.北京:中华书局,1981.

[3]牟宗三.心体与性体:上[M]//牟宗三文集.吴兴文,主编.长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2015:66-67.

[4]黎靖德,编.朱子语类:第6册[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1986:1813.

[5]陈寿.三国志:第3册[M].裴松之,注.北京:中华书局,1982:795.

[6]王弼注.老子道德经注校释[M].楼宇烈,校释.北京:中华书局,2008.

[7]侯外庐,邱汉生,张岂之,主编.宋明理学史:上卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1984:125.

[8]徐洪兴.论二程思想之异同[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2006(5):64-71.

[9]吕箐雯.双重视域下《通书》之“无为”与“诚”关系探析[J].船山学刊,2022(6):108-116.

[10]周敦颐.周敦颐集[M].陈克明,点校.北京:中华书局,1990:31.

[11]张载.張子全書[M].林乐昌,编校.西安:西北大学出版社,2015.

[12]周赟.恰当的有为:张载天道自然观研究[J].东方哲学,2020(0):107-121.

[13]马海旺.张载人格气象探析[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2023,32(5):87-92.

[14]李哲奇.“若问先天一字无”:邵雍先天工夫发微[J].广东社会科学,2023(5):84-94.

[15]邵雍.邵雍集[M].郭彧,整理.北京:中华书局,2010:159.

[16]杨立华.宋明理学十五讲[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015:190.

[17]黎靖德,编.朱子语类:第4册[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1986:1155.

[18]黎靖德,编.朱子语类:第1册[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1986:150.

[19]黎靖德,编.朱子语类:第5册[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1986:1550.

[20]王守仁.王阳明全集[M].吴光,钱明,董平,等,编校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2011.

基本信息:

中图分类号:B244.6

引用信息:

[1]姜吉龙,郑熊.无思无为:二程“无为”观探析[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2026,35(04):93-99.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金项目“‘道法自然’观念发展史及价值研究”(23BZX020); 西北大学研究生科研创新项目“基于‘寂’‘化’范畴的二程理学本体论体系探析”(CX2026048)

发布时间:

2026-08-06

出版时间:

2026-08-06

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文